杨梓
发表于9分钟前
回复
:抗美援朝期间,美帝轰炸鸭绿江大桥阴谋破产后,敌人远东情报局不甘心失败,遂派遣特务马小飞(罗泰 饰)通过列车上当乘务员的女特务王曼丽(叶琳琅 饰)接头,同本溪开药店的暗藏特务吴济春(方化 饰)勾结,指使特务徐福祥(金林 饰)颠覆我军列未遂后,又将其灭口。我铁路公安处侦察科长高健发动群众展开反特防特斗争,自己则化名顾野平打入敌人内部,并让铁路报务员何兰英(宋雪娟 饰)协助自己的工作,掌握了敌人的活动计划和潜伏名单。马小飞通过吴济春网罗大批流亡地主分子,妄想同时在三个不同地点破坏我交通运输线,结某阴谋被粉碎,吴济春被二楞子(李博 饰)击毙。一计不成,敌人又把定时炸弹安放在既将通过长岭隧道的列车上......
尹姝贻
发表于4分钟前
回复
:Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.