剧情简介
彼德在新闻界是个呼风唤雨的经纪人，坏人好梦包装政客候选人是他的生财之道，坏人好梦颠倒是非，混淆视听是他的拿手好戏。那些被他包装的候选人有如傀儡一般被打扮成受人欢迎政治偶像，吹嘘阒根本无法实现的政治报复。凭借彼德的智慧和候选人充足的资金支持，选举往往是胜券在握。眼看新一届州长大选在即，竞选风云再起杀场，但彼德似乎另有打算……
坏人好梦
彼德在新闻界是个呼风唤雨的经纪人，坏人好梦包装政客候选人是他的生财之道，坏人好梦颠倒是非，混淆视听是他的拿手好戏。那些被他包装的候选人有如傀儡一般被打扮成受人欢迎政治偶像，吹嘘阒根本无法实现的政治报复。凭借彼德的智慧和候选人充足的资金支持，选举往往是胜券在握。眼看新一届州长大选在即，竞选风云再起杀场，但彼德似乎另有打算……
玛莉佛芮崔克森
回复 :影片由唐·钱德尔自导自演，讲述一个与著名爵士音乐家、小号家迈尔斯·戴维斯有关的故事。
梁咏琪
回复 :《蓝色情人节》在分级上经历了一波三折，最终被定为R级。Dean(瑞恩·高斯林 Ryan Gosling 饰)和Cindy(米歇尔·威廉姆斯 Michelle Williams 饰)在朝夕相处了六个年头之后，他们的婚姻出现了问题。两人想借情人节之际修补彼此的关系， 特意将女儿留在外公家。他们还特意找了一家情人酒店，想找点新的“兴奋点”来刺激自己的爱情。可两人就对未来的生活态度发生了争执，感情不但没有修复反而愈吵愈烈。Dean安逸于有妻女的平淡生活，但Cindy却希望开创属于自己的事业。随着两人的分歧不断升温，那些以往美好婚姻生活中的幸福的片段如今却变成了令人难堪和苦恼的回忆。是否一段感情必须要经历“七年之痒”的磨练？这两个曾经相爱的彼此，曾经甜蜜的婚姻，否则最终会走向支离破碎？
唐妮布莱斯顿
回复 :Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.'By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses.Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together.One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around.While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with hisher partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken.Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...
