剧情简介
在这样一个精神失常的世界里，亚洲谁才是真正的疯子?这是一部讲述年轻情侣们不断逃跑，亚洲交织着诗意与现实影像，极具讽刺性的朋克式公路电影。无聊的比安卡绑架了一个孩子，并让轻信的拉奇帮她们创建一个家。他们一起组成了一个片刻的家庭，坐着房车出发，逃离法律和一群坏蛋。
亚洲爆乳AV无一区二区三区
在这样一个精神失常的世界里，亚洲谁才是真正的疯子?这是一部讲述年轻情侣们不断逃跑，亚洲交织着诗意与现实影像，极具讽刺性的朋克式公路电影。无聊的比安卡绑架了一个孩子，并让轻信的拉奇帮她们创建一个家。他们一起组成了一个片刻的家庭，坐着房车出发，逃离法律和一群坏蛋。
丁文琪
回复 :20 years after her husband's death, a woman keeps more than just his memory alive. Needing help at home, she takes in a student, but soon detects a risk of losing her husband to the girl. Does the girl have even a ghost of a chance?
李元智
回复 :因为儿子尹泰宇（元斌 饰）是智障，所以母亲（金惠子 饰）总是担心他受伤。一天，泰宇被一辆奔驰车撞倒，朋友镇泰（秦久 饰）带他去高尔夫球场找打球的教授报仇，结果被带回了警局。因为镇泰踢坏了后视镜，教授向他们索赔，泰宇被当成了挡箭牌。 从警局出来后，在家吃过晚饭，泰宇去找镇泰喝酒，但此时镇泰趁着夜色回到球场找出了白天扔进湖中的球杆。泰宇酒后尾随一个名叫文雅中的女学生，结果第二天雅中的尸体就出现在屋顶。泰宇被当做唯一的嫌疑人带回了警局，接着在警察的威胁下画押认罪。得知儿子入狱，心急如焚的母亲委托著名律师为他翻案。但是，泰宇的病影响了他的记忆，母亲在替儿申冤的道路上步履蹒跚……
藤木直人
回复 :2018年5月和6月，Jean Gabriel P_Riot与位于Ivry Sur Seine的一所高中的10名电影班学生合作，开展了一项将电影与政治结合起来的项目。学生们在摄像机前和摄像机后工作，重新布置罢工、抵抗和劳资纠纷的场景，这些电影可以追溯到20世纪60年代末到70年代末，包括让-卢克-戈达尔和阿兰-坦纳的电影。nos d_faites汇集了调查结果，并增加了采访，在采访中，导演询问学生他们刚刚表演的场景，关于“阶级”、“工会”和“政治参与”等概念，以及更广泛的社会背景。这是一个简单，但尖锐的设置，让观众一瞥年轻一代如何看待政治和过去的政治电影。这部影片还记录了导演试图激怒学生的企图。在导演和学生似乎处于平等地位的遭遇中，基于从未见过的导演更多类似于老师的提问，以及此时此刻对革命的思考：起义的表现反映了同样的情况。这会导致一个真实的发生吗？In May and June 2018, Jean-Gabriel Périot collaborated with ten students in a film class at a high school in Ivry-sur-Seine on a project that unites cinema with politics. The students worked both in front of and behind the camera, restaging scenes of strikes, resistance, and labour disputes from films dating from the late 1960s to the late 1970s, including ones by Jean-Luc Godard and Alain Tanner. Nos défaites assembles the results, and adds interviews in which the director queries the students about the scenes they’ve just acted in, about such concepts as “class,” “labour union,” and “political engagement,” about wider social contexts. It’s a simple, yet trenchant setup, affording viewers a glimpse of how a younger generation sees politics and the political cinema of the past. The film also documents the director’s attempts to stir up the students. The conversations vary between encounters in which director and students seem on an equal footing, based on more teacher-like questioning by the never-visible director, and contemplations of revolution in the here and now: the performance of an uprising follows reflection upon the same. Could this lead to one happening for real?回到1968年的电影时代，继续对重放从过去跳出来的电影节选的年轻人进行今天的采访，我们的失败描绘了我们当前与政治的关系。我们的失败，还是我们有足够的力量来面对今天的混乱？By going back into the cinema of the 1968 era and going forward with present-day interviews of young people who replay excerpts of film s jumping out from the past, Our Defeats draw the portrait of our current relations with politics. Our Defeats, or do we keep enough forces to confront ourselves with the chaos of today?
